ทีมงานพร้อมให้บริการ · ภาษาอังกฤษ ↔ ภาษาไทย · โทร +66 02-859-2145 · NDA ตั้งแต่อีเมลฉบับแรก · รับใบเสนอราคาใน 1 ชั่วโมง
ขอใบเสนอราคา
ISO 14064 LEAD AUDITOR · CQI/IRCA · GHG QUANTIFICATION + VERIFICATION · 3 PARTS · INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE
Panit Chancharoonpong · certified Jun 2024 · CQI/IRCA register
โอเทลโล่ / Certifications / ISO 14064 Lead Auditor
★ ISO 14064 · LEAD AUDITOR · CQI/IRCA ACCREDITED · 3 STANDARD PARTS · PAIRS WITH AA1000AS · TGO-RECOGNISED

The standard independent assurers verify GHG against.

ISO 14064 is the international standard for greenhouse gas quantification, monitoring, reporting, and verification — three parts that together create the complete cycle: measure (Part 1 organisation or Part 2 project), verify (Part 3). The หัวหน้าผู้ตรวจสอบบัญชี credential, awarded by CQI/IRCA, is the gold-standard individual qualification to plan, execute, and lead an ISO 14064-3 verification engagement under ISO 14065:2020 body controls. Panit Chancharoonpong holds it, certified June 2024 — the credential that lets Othello’s bench verify Scope 1, 2, 3 inventories against the standard CDP, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and SBTi all accept. Verifiable on the CQI/IRCA Register without going through Othello.

Standard Parts
3
14064-1 · 14064-2 · 14064-3
Verification Standard
14064-3
2019 · current revision
Panit Certified
2024
June · CQI/IRCA accredited
Reasonable-Assurance Materiality
5%
Industry default · risk-tested
★ CREDENTIAL POSTURE · INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE
Lead Auditor · CQI/IRCA. Verifiable register.
  • CredentialISO 14064 Lead Auditor
  • AccreditorCQI/IRCA · UK chartered
  • PractitionerPanit C. · Jun 2024
  • Body standardISO 14065:2020
  • AccreditationISO/IEC 17029:2019
  • ตรวจสอบยืนยันCQI/IRCA Register
  • Stacks withAA1000AS · ISAE 3410
★ §01 · The Three Parts Of ISO 14064 · Measure · Measure · Verify

Three parts. Two measure. One verifies. Verification is where the Lead Auditor credential applies.

ISO 14064 is structured as three independent-but-paired standards — Part 1 quantifies at the organisation level, Part 2 quantifies at the project level, and Part 3 verifies whichever assertion was produced. Parts 1 and 2 are written for emitters; Part 3 is written for the independent assurer. Panit’s Lead Auditor credential authorises Part 3 engagement leadership — the verification work that converts a company’s GHG report into something CDP, CSRD, and SBTi will accept.

VERIFICATION STANDARD · ISO 14064-3:2019

Part 3. Where Lead Auditor applies.

Specification with guidance for the verification and validation of GHG statements.

ISO 14064-3:2019 specifies the principles, requirements, and process for independently verifying GHG assertions — historical inventory data, project-level reductions, or product carbon footprints. It is the standard CDP, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and SBTi accept as the framework that proves a company’s emissions claims. A Lead Auditor under Part 3 plans the engagement, sets the assurance level (limited or reasonable), determines materiality, gathers evidence, and signs the verification statement.

What an ISO 14064-3 Lead Auditor leads
  • Engagement planning · assurance-level decision · criteria and scope
  • Strategic analysis of GHG source categories · sampling strategy
  • Risk assessment · data systems, controls, and material-misstatement points
  • Evidence gathering · recomputation, source-system tracing, interviews
  • Materiality determination · typically 5% for reasonable assurance
  • Verification statement drafting, sign-off, and archive
14064-1
ORGANISATION LEVEL · 2018

Quantify the whole company’s footprint.

ISO 14064-1:2018 specifies how an organisation designs, develops, manages, reports, and verifies its GHG inventory. Covers direct emissions (Scope 1), energy-indirect (Scope 2), and other-indirect (Scope 3) under a categorisation aligned with — but not identical to — the GHG Protocol. The auditable counterpart to GHG Protocol corporate accounting.

CSRD-ALIGNED Scope 1+2+3 Corporate Auditable
14064-2
PROJECT LEVEL · 2019

Quantify a single reduction project.

ISO 14064-2:2019 specifies baselines, monitoring, quantification, and reporting for individual GHG-reduction or removal projects. The standard underwriting carbon-offset claims — relevant for VERRA and CORSIA project work, voluntary carbon market submissions, and emission-reduction credit issuance. Less commonly invoked than Part 1, but mandatory where a single project’s reductions are the unit being claimed.

Project-specific Baselines VERRA · CORSIA Offsets
Parts 1 + 2 verified under Part 3 by the Lead Auditor

VERSION ASYMMETRY · WORTH NOTING · Part 1 was revised in 2018; Parts 2 and 3 were revised in 2019. Vendors that cite “ISO 14064:2006” or “14064-3:2006” are quoting an obsolete version — the 2019 revision substantially restructured verification practice and is the version any post-2020 assurance engagement should reference. Othello’s bench works exclusively to the current revisions.

★ §02 · Verification vs Validation · Two Distinct Engagements

Two words that are not synonyms.

Vendors and even some publications use “verification” and “validation” interchangeably; ISO 14064-3 does not. Verification looks backward at historical data; validation looks forward at projections or plans. The distinction governs scope, evidence, materiality threshold, and the language of the final statement — and is the single technical point most often confused at procurement.

VERIFICATION · BACKWARD-LOOKING

Verification.

Confirming historical GHG data is accurate, complete, consistent.

Verification is the post-hoc audit of an organisation’s reported emissions for a completed reporting period. The Lead Auditor evaluates whether the GHG statement is materially correct against the criteria — typically Part 1 for corporate inventories or Part 2 for projects. Materiality is normally 5% for reasonable assurance, looser for limited. The output is a verification statement: positive-form for reasonable assurance, negative-form for limited.

DirectionBackward
หัวข้อHistorical data
การประเมินสาระสำคัญ~5% reasonable
Used byCDP · CSRD · TGO
VALIDATION · FORWARD-LOOKING

Validation.

Confirming projections, baselines, or plans are reasonable.

Validation is the prospective evaluation of a forward-looking GHG claim — project baselines, monitoring plans, reduction projections, target pathways. The Lead Auditor evaluates whether the assumptions, methodology, and projected outcomes are reasonable, supportable, and free from material bias. Common at project initiation (Part 2), in SBTi target submission, and in CDM/Verra project design document review.

DirectionForward
หัวข้อProjections · plans
การประเมินสาระสำคัญBias-tested
Used bySBTi · VERRA · CDM

WHY THE DISTINCTION MATTERS COMMERCIALLY · A company asking for “verification” of next year’s net-zero commitment is asking for validation; a company asking for “validation” of last year’s emissions report is asking for verification. Confusing the two changes scope, price, evidence demand, and statement language. Othello scopes the right engagement at the engagement letter — not after the work starts.

★ §03 · The Six-Stage Verification Workflow · ISO 14064-3:2019

Six stages. Engagement planning to verification statement.

ISO 14064-3 sets out a six-stage verification process, anchored in risk-based evidence gathering and materiality-led conclusions. Othello operates each stage with a documented gate; no stage advances unsigned. The Lead Auditor anchors all six — not just the testing stages — and signs the verification statement personally.

★ ISO 14064-3:2019 PROCESS · LEAD-AUDITOR-ANCHORED · CQI/IRCA-COMPETENT

From terms of engagement to signed verification statement. Materiality-led, risk-based.

The six stages below are the standard process flow under ISO 14064-3:2019 as operated by an ISO 14065:2020-compliant verification body, led by a CQI/IRCA-certified Lead Auditor. Materiality is the binding evidence-volume control — set at engagement planning, recalibrated if findings warrant, and binding on the conclusion. For reasonable assurance, materiality is typically 5% of the reported GHG total; for limited assurance, looser. See กระบวนการทำงานของเรา for the broader bench discipline.

STAGE 01
Engagement planning.The Lead Auditor establishes assurance level (limited or reasonable), criteria (Part 1 or Part 2), scope (boundary and gases), and objectives. Independence and competence checks confirmed; team named including the Lead Auditor’s role; engagement letter signed before any evidence work begins.
STAGE 02
Strategic analysis.The team reviews the organisation’s operations, GHG sources, data systems, and reporting boundaries. Strategic-level understanding informs risk assessment and sampling. The “look around” before the “look closely” — without it, evidence-gathering misses material sources.
STAGE 03
Risk assessment · materiality.Inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk are assessed by source category. Materiality is set — typically 5% of the reported total for reasonable assurance. The risk profile drives evidence-gathering intensity per source: high-risk Scope 1 stationary combustion may receive recomputation; low-risk Scope 2 with audited utility bills may receive review-level testing.
STAGE 04
Evidence gathering.The substantive testing work — recomputation, source-system tracing, document inspection, interviews, analytical procedures. For organisation-level engagements, this typically includes utility-bill verification, fuel-purchase ledger walk-through, fleet records, and Scope 3 emission-factor application. Findings logged; management responses solicited and documented.
STAGE 05
Evaluation of evidence.The Lead Auditor evaluates whether the GHG statement is materially correct against the criteria, considering aggregated findings against materiality. Qualified or unqualified conclusion determined; modifications to scope or methodology documented. This is the judgment stage — mechanical only on paper; substantively driven by Lead-Auditor experience.
STAGE 06
Verification statement · archive.กระบวนการรับรองนิติกรณ์เอกสารของ verification statement is drafted per ISO 14064-3 information requirements — scope, criteria, assurance level, materiality, methodology, conclusion (positive-form for reasonable, negative-form for limited), signature and date. Engagement file — planning memo, evidence log, management responses, draft and final statement — retained Bangkok-side per the engagement letter.

MATERIALITY IS THE LEVER · The 5% materiality floor for reasonable assurance is industry convention — ISO 14064-3 does not prescribe a fixed percentage. Sophisticated procurement panels confirm the materiality threshold at engagement letter rather than discovering it in the final statement. Othello documents materiality at scoping — including the qualitative factors that may tighten it (regulatory exposure, listed-company disclosure obligations, capital-markets timing).

★ §04 · The Standards Stack Behind The Credential

Six standards. One credentialled practitioner.

An ISO 14064 Lead Auditor credential is not a free-standing certificate — it sits inside a documented stack of auditor accreditation, body standards, and pairing protocols. The six standards below are the regulatory floor that makes Panit’s credential operationally meaningful at Thai SET-listed corporates, EU-facing exporters, and US-procurement engagements alike.

STD 01 · LEAD AUDITOR

CQI/IRCA certification.

The Chartered Quality Institute and International Register of Certificated Auditors — the UK chartered body that certifies management-systems auditors against documented competence criteria, including continuing professional development. Lead Auditor is one of three CQI/IRCA grades (Auditor, Lead Auditor, Principal Auditor); Lead Auditor is the grade that authorises engagement leadership.

BodyCQI/IRCA
Gradeหัวหน้าผู้ตรวจสอบบัญชี
ระยะเวลาCPD-conditional
STD 02 · BODY STANDARD

ISO 14065:2020.

The standard for verification and validation bodies: general principles and requirements for organisations validating and verifying environmental information. Sets the impartiality, competence-management, and quality-management requirements a verification body must operate under. A Lead Auditor without a 14065-compliant body operates outside the standard’s expected envelope.

ScopeBody standard
Replaces14065:2013
Issued2020
STD 03 · ACCREDITATION

ISO/IEC 17029:2019.

Conformity-assessment general principles and requirements for validation and verification bodies. The standard that accreditors (ANAB, UKAS, ENAS) apply when accrediting an ISO 14065 body. The chain is: 17029 governs the accreditor → accreditor accredits the 14065 body → 14065 body deploys 14064-3 Lead Auditors against client engagements. Three layers, each documented.

LayerAccreditor
BodiesANAB · UKAS
UnderliesISO 14065
STD 04 · GHG STANDARD

ISO 14064-3:2019.

The verification methodology standard itself — the substantive standard the Lead Auditor applies. Specifies principles, requirements, and guidance for verifying and validating GHG statements prepared under 14064-1 or 14064-2 or other GHG programmes. The standard CDP, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and SBTi accept as the framework for third-party GHG verification.

หัวข้อV&V methodology
Applies to14064-1 / -2
Accepted byCDP · CSRD
STD 05 · ISAE PAIRING

ISAE 3410 cross-reference.

For audit-firm-facing engagements, the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3410 (the IAASB’s GHG-specific assurance standard) is the IFAC-anchored framework that maps to ISO 14064-3 substantively. Many capital-markets and IFRS S2 disclosure engagements expect both — ISAE 3410 for the audit-firm reading, ISO 14064-3 for the engineering reading. Othello operates the pairing on engagements where both audiences read the statement.

IssuerIAASB
Anchored inIFAC
Pair useIFRS S2 · ESRS
STD 06 · AA1000AS STACK

AA1000AS v3 overlay.

AccountAbility’s “Guidance on Assuring GHG Emissions with AA1000 v3” permits AA1000AS Type 2 assurance to be applied in conjunction with ISO 14064-3 — the configuration most Thai SET-listed corporates need to satisfy both TGO submission and forward IFRS S2 expectations. Panit holds both credentials on the same bench — ACSAP and ISO 14064 Lead Auditor — so the pairing is delivered by one practitioner. See /certifications/aa1000as/.

OverlayAA1000AS v3
Combined PanitBoth creds
Use caseSET + IFRS S2

THE STACK IS WHY THE CREDENTIAL MATTERS · An individual ISO 14064 training certificate without CQI/IRCA Lead Auditor accreditation, without a 14065-compliant body, and without ISO/IEC 17029-accredited oversight is decorative. The full stack is what gives the resulting verification statement standing with sophisticated buyers. Each layer is independently verifiable at procurement — Othello provides the chain on request under NDA.

★ Adjacent · Where ISO 14064 Connects Across The Practice

ISO 14064 is the engineering standard. Three adjacent credentials sit on the same bench.

ISO 14064 Lead Auditor sits inside Othello’s seven-credential ESG-assurance cluster, anchored by Panit Chancharoonpong. Together they cover the substantive backing for every climate, carbon, and sustainability-assurance engagement — one bench, one engagement letter, one audit-trail.

★ ISO 14064 FAQ · Ten Procurement Questions

Procurement questions answered up front.

Substantive answers to what audit committees, sustainability heads, and procurement panels routinely ask when reviewing ISO 14064 verification providers and Othello’s Lead-Auditor-anchored posture.

คำถามที่ 01What does ISO 14064 actually cover, and who issues it?

ISO 14064 is the international standard for greenhouse gas quantification, monitoring, reporting, and verification, published by the International Organization for Standardization in three parts: ISO 14064-1:2018 (organisation-level GHG inventories), ISO 14064-2:2019 (project-level reductions), and ISO 14064-3:2019 (validation and verification methodology). The standard is GHG-programme neutral — it can be applied alongside CDP, CDM, Verra, TGO, ICAO CORSIA, or any other recognised programme. For Thai SET-listed corporates with capital-markets exposure, ISO 14064-1 plus ISO 14064-3 is the practical configuration for getting credible verified emissions data into 56-1 One Report and IFRS S2 disclosure.

คำถามที่ 02What does the “Lead Auditor” credential authorise specifically?

Lead Auditor is the CQI/IRCA grade that authorises an individual to plan, lead, and sign off an ISO 14064-3 verification engagement. The Auditor grade (one step lower) participates under leadership but does not sign; the Principal Auditor grade (one step higher) typically anchors complex multi-site or industry-specific engagements. Lead Auditor is the operational grade for standard organisation-level verification engagements — the grade that maps to “the auditor whose name is on the verification statement.” Panit holds Lead Auditor, certified by CQI/IRCA in June 2024.

คำถามที่ 03How is verification different from validation?

Direction. Verification looks backward at historical GHG data — confirming a completed reporting period’s emissions are materially correct against ISO 14064-1 or -2 criteria. Validation looks forward at projections, baselines, or plans — confirming a SBTi target, a project baseline, or a reduction projection is reasonable and supportable. The two engagements have different scope, different evidence, different materiality treatment, and different statement language. ISO 14064-3 covers both, and the distinction is set at engagement letter. A company asking for “verification” of next year’s target is asking for validation.

คำถามที่ 04Limited vs reasonable assurance — what’s the difference and which do we need?

Limited assurance reduces engagement risk to an acceptable level but yields a negative-form conclusion — “nothing has come to our attention to indicate the subject matter is materially misstated.” Lower evidence threshold, looser materiality, lower cost. Reasonable assurance reduces engagement risk to a low level and yields a positive-form conclusion — “the subject matter is fairly stated, in all material respects.” Higher evidence threshold, materiality typically 5% of reported total, deeper testing. IFRS S2 Phase 2 is moving toward reasonable assurance on key metrics — including the Thai SEC implementation pathway. For SET-listed disclosure, reasonable assurance is increasingly the expectation rather than the option.

คำถามที่ 05How does the 5% materiality threshold work in practice?

Materiality is the quantitative threshold above which a misstatement is considered to affect the conclusion. For reasonable assurance on a corporate GHG inventory, materiality of 5% of the total reported emissions is industry convention — meaning aggregated unidentified or unresolved errors must remain below 5% for the verifier to issue an unqualified positive-form conclusion. The 5% is not prescribed by the standard; ISO 14064-3 requires materiality to be set and disclosed but leaves the level to the verifier’s judgment. Qualitative materiality can tighten the threshold — regulatory exposure, listed-company disclosure obligations, or capital-markets timing may justify 3% or even 1%. Othello documents materiality at the engagement letter, not after the work begins.

คำถามที่ 06How does ISO 14064 relate to the GHG Protocol?

Complementary, not competing. กระบวนการรับรองนิติกรณ์เอกสารของ GHG Protocol is the most widely used methodology framework for calculating corporate emissions — it provides detailed Scope 3 guidance (15 categories), specific calculation rules, and is the basis for CDP, SBTi, and most voluntary reporting. ISO 14064-1 is the auditable standard for the resulting GHG report — written so that an independent third party can formally verify whether the emissions report follows its requirements. In practice, most EU and Thai companies use GHG Protocol to calculate emissions and ISO 14064-1 to formally verify and report them. Othello’s bench works fluently in both — GHG Protocol on the calculation side, ISO 14064-1 + -3 on the verification side.

คำถามที่ 07How can a procurement team verify Panit’s Lead Auditor credential independently?

By searching the CQI/IRCA Auditor Register at quality.org. CQI/IRCA-certified Lead Auditors are listed by name with their grade (Auditor / Lead Auditor / Principal Auditor) and scheme (ISO 14064, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, etc.). The listing is the verification, no email to Othello required. The register is the same body that certifies management-system auditors globally and is widely recognised by procurement at SET-listed corporates, EU institutional buyers, and US Government contractors. Othello will provide the certificate copy and credential number under mutual NDA on request — but the public register should be checked first.

คำถามที่ 08How does ISO 14064 interact with TGO and Thai regulatory expectations?

The Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO) is the Thai national GHG authority, and it recognises ISO 14064-3 verification as one of the accepted frameworks for verifying carbon footprint claims submitted to its Carbon Footprint Organization (CFO) and Carbon Footprint Product (CFP) programmes. Panit holds TGO CFO+CFP Auditor accreditation alongside the ISO 14064 Lead Auditor credential — meaning Othello can both submit Thai-specific CFO/CFP claims to TGO and verify the underlying inventory against ISO 14064-3 in one engagement. For SET-listed corporates with both TGO submissions and CDP / IFRS S2 disclosure, the pairing is operationally efficient. See all 20 credentials for the broader stack.

คำถามที่ 09Can ISO 14064-3 verification stand alone, or does it need AA1000AS or ISAE 3410 alongside?

It can stand alone — but the audience determines whether it should. For internal use, voluntary CDP disclosure, or many TGO programmes, ISO 14064-3 alone is sufficient. For audit-firm-facing engagements, ISAE 3410 should be paired — the IAASB’s GHG-specific assurance standard that audit firms recognise as the IFAC-anchored framework. For sustainability-report assurance reading by ESG investors, AA1000AS v3 should be paired — the principles-based overlay that addresses stakeholder engagement and materiality processes. For IFRS S2 disclosure with capital-markets exposure, the practical stack is ISO 14064-3 + ISAE 3410 + AA1000AS. Panit’s credentials cover all three.

Q.10How does ISO 14064 fit Othello’s broader engagement framework?

ISO 14064 Lead Auditor is the second anchor of Othello’s seven-credential ESG-assurance cluster, alongside AA1000AS ACSAP, TGO CFO+CFP Auditor, VERRA Lead Assessor, CORSIA Verifier, ICVCM CCP, and ISCC PLUS — all held by Panit Chancharoonpong. Together they cover the substantive backing for every climate, carbon, and sustainability-assurance engagement Othello delivers. Founded 2020 on US Government bilingual contracts under FAR-grade contractor verification, the firm’s procurement-grade audit-trail standard applies to ISO 14064 engagements the same way it applies to ATA-certified translation or 56-1 One Report disclosure. One engagement letter, one NDA from first email, one audit-trail Bangkok-side, twenty credentials behind it. Email [email protected] or call +66 02-859-2145.

Verified emissions. Twenty credentials behind the statement.

ISO 14064 Lead Auditor, CQI/IRCA-certified, held by Panit Chancharoonpong since June 2024 — independently verifiable on the CQI/IRCA Auditor Register. AA1000AS ACSAP, TGO, VERRA, CORSIA, ICVCM, ISCC PLUS on the same bench — the configuration most Thai SET-listed corporates need for CDP, CSRD, IFRS S2, and SBTi alignment. ≤1 BH acknowledgement · scoping call within 1 BD · NDA from first email.

+66 02-859-2145 · [email protected]
ยูนิต 12-03 อาคาร Chartered Square · 152 ถนนสาทรเหนือ · สีลม · กรุงเทพฯ 10500
ISO 14064 Lead Auditor · CQI/IRCA Accredited · Panit Chancharoonpong · Jun 2024 · 14064-1 (2018) · 14064-2 (2019) · 14064-3 (2019) · ISO 14065:2020 Body Standard · ISO/IEC 17029:2019 Accreditation · Stacks with AA1000AS · ISAE 3410 · CDP · CSRD · IFRS S2 · SBTi · TGO · VERRA · CORSIA · Verifiable on CQI/IRCA Register โอเทลโล่ อินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล

Related carbon & climate services

คู่มือ FTSE 2026Free ESG disclosure guides
Chat on LINEแอดไลน์ · ตอบใน 1 ชม.
Add Othello ESG on LINE (QR code)
แอดไลน์ · Add us on LINE
Scan to chat with Othello ESG on LINE — a reply within one business hour, under NDA from the first message.
Open LINE →

Research & Reports

Free Tools

เครื่องมือและงานวิจัยฟรี รายงานสถานะการเปิดเผยข้อมูล ESG· ตรวจสอบคะแนน ESG Rating· คู่มือ FTSE 2026· เรดาร์ติดตามกฎระเบียบ· เครื่องมือตรวจจับการฟอกเขียว (Greenwashing)