About this resource
How the scorecard works — and what your band means
The twelve questions mirror the disclosure dimensions that carry weight under FTSE Russell’s methodology and IFRS S2: evidenced board oversight, materiality assessment, quantified Scope 1 & 2 (and material Scope 3) inventories, dated targets with base years, scenario analysis, assurance, sector-specific metrics, framework alignment inside the 56-1 One Report — and the two dimensions most Thai issuers overlook: whether the full disclosure exists in rater-readable English, and whether the terminology is consistent between the Thai and English editions.
Your result is an indicative band from 0 to 5, deliberately shaped like the FTSE scale. The reference point that matters for a Thai (Advanced Emerging) issuer is the FTSE4Good addition bar around 2.9 — the threshold at which index eligibility begins. Scoring below it does not mean weak ESG work; in our experience the gap is usually disclosure that exists in Thai but is invisible in English, or numbers published without the methodology tags and base years a rater needs to trust them.
The scorecard is self-assessed and indicative — an honest mirror, not an official rating. When you want the real thing, we run a FTSE-style Report Card against your actual latest filed report: scored, evidenced and prioritised under NDA. Start with the Readiness Navigator for your sequenced roadmap, or read how the score is built in the 2026 flagship report.